Logic Seminar

  • January 27, 2012 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Vassilis Gregoriades
    The complexity of the set of points of continuity of a multi-valued function

    Abstract: We consider a notion of continuity concerning multi-valued functions between metric spaces. We focus on multi-valued functions assigning points to nonempty closed sets and we answer the question asked by M. Ziegler (Real Computation with Least Discrete Advice: A Complexity Theory of Nonuniform Computability with Applications to Effective Linear Algebra, to appear in Ann. Pure Appl. Logic) of determining the complexity of the set of points of continuity of such a multi-valued function. We will see that, under appropriate compactness assumptions, the complexity of this set is low in the hierarchy of Borel sets. On the other hand in the general case it might not even be a Borel set. In particular, this notion of continuity is not metrizable in the following sense: if we view a multi-valued function F from X to Y as a single-valued function from X to the family F(Y) of closed subsets of Y, it is not necessarily the case that there is a metrizable topology on F(Y) such that F is continuous at an arbitrary x in the usual sense (of single-valued functions) exactly when it is continuous at x in the sense of multi-valued functions. We will also present some similar results about a stronger notion of continuity, which is closely related to the Fell topology and thus in some cases turns out to be metrizable. 

  • Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 14:25 in S2|15-201
    Jean-Yves Beziau, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ 
    Visiting Professor University of Munich, LMU
    Universal logic: A general completeness theorem 

    Abstract: The aim of universal logic is to develop general concepts and proofs for a better understanding of logical systems. After giving a brief overview of universal logic I will present a general completeness theorem linking sequent systems with bivaluations. 

  • January 13, 2012 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Sam Sanders, Ghent University
    Reuniting the antipodes: bringing together Nonstandard Analysis and 
    Constructive Analysis 

    Abstract:
    Constructive Analysis was introduced by Erret Bishop to identify the `computational meaning' of mathematics. In the spirit of intuitionistic mathematics, notions like `algorithm,' `explicit computation,' and `finite procedure' are central. The exact meaning of these vague terms was left open, to ensure the compatibility of Constructive Analysis with several traditions in mathematics. Constructive Reverse Mathematics (CRM) is a spin-off of Harvey Friedman's famous Reverse Mathematics program, based on Constructive Analysis. Bishop famously derided Nonstandard Analysis for its lack of computational meaning. In this talk, we introduce`?-invariance': a simple and elegant definition of `finite procedure' in (classical) Nonstandard Analysis. Using an intuitive interpretation, we obtain many results from CRM, thus showing that ?-invariance is quite close to Bishop's notion of `finite procedure.'  
  • Tuesday, January 12, 2012 at 11:00 in S2|15-201
    Yoshihiro Maruyama, Oxford University
    Chu Duality, Born Coalgebras, and Quantum Symmetries

    Abstract: After a brief overview of recent developments of quantum foundations in Oxford, we focus on Abramsky's representations of quantum systems as Chu spaces and as coalgebras, with the purpose of analysing them from the viewpoint of duality theory. We first develop a general theory of dualities between point-free and point-set spaces, based on the formalism of Chu space. The Chu duality theory includes, as a special case, a duality between quantum state spaces and property observables. Building upon the duality, we refine Abramsky's coalgebraic representation of quantum symmetries, so that our (non-fibred) category of coalgebras turns out to be strictly smaller than Abramsky's fibred one; at the same time, however, it is still big enough to represent quantum symmetries. 

Logic Seminar 2011


  • December 9, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Jaime Gaspar
    The infinite pigeonhole principle

    Abstract: The infinite pigeonhole principle is one of the world's most evident statements: if we colour the natural numbers with finitely many colours, then some colour occurs infinitely often. Despite its obviousness, its treatment can be surprisingly challenging. We are going to illustrate this with two case studies: 1. the finitary infinite pigeonhole principles in Tao's programme of finitisations in analysis; 2. the infinite pigeonhole principle in a quantitative version of Hillam's theorem characterising the convergence of fixed point iterations. 
    * Financially supported by the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia under grant SFRH/BD/36358/2007 co-financed by Programa Operacional Potencial Humano / Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional / Fundo Social Europeu (União Europeia). 
  • Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Paulo Oliva, Queen Mary University of London
    On the restricted form of Spector's bar recursion.
  • November 11, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Feng Shiguang, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou
     
    This talk is about the expressive power and complexity of second-order extended Horn logic and Krom logic.

    Descriptive complexity is a bridge between complexity theory and logic. It asks for the logic resources that are necessary to define the computational resources such as time, space or the amount of hardware that are necessary to decide a property. Horn and Krom logic have their origins in propositional logic. Some researchers extend them to second logic, named SO-HORN and SO-KROM logic. We define revised and extended versions of these logics and get some results. We show that SO-HORN$^r$ and ($\exists$)SO-KROM$^r$ capture P and NL on ordered structures, respectively, and both SO-EHORN and $\Pi^{1}_{1}$-KROM capture co-NP. 

  • November 4, 2011 at 15:00 in S2|15-201
    Jaime Gaspar
    Goedel functional interpretation

    This talk is a one-hour mini-tutorial introducing from scratch the bare-bones of the Goedel functional interpretation.
  • November 4, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Pavol Safarik
    A quantitative nonlinear strong ergodic theorem for Hilbert spaces

    Abstract: We give a quantitative version of a strong nonlinear ergodic theorem for (a class of possibly even discontinuous) selfmappings of an arbitrary subset of a Hilbert space due to R.~Wittmann and outline how the existence of uniform bounds in such quantitative formulations of ergodic theorems can be proved by means of a general logical metatheorem. In particular these bounds depend neither on the operator nor on the initial point. Furthermore, we extract such uniform bounds in our quantitative formulation of Wittmann's theorem, implicitly using the proof-theoretic techniques on which the metatheorem is based. However, we present our result and its proof in analytic terms without any reference to logic as such. Our bounds turn out to involve nested iterations of relatively low computational complexity. While in theory these kind of iterations ought to be expected, so far this seems to be the first occurrence of such a nested use observed in practice. October 28, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201

  • October 28, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Vassilis Gregoriades
    The effective theory on arbitrary Polish spaces

    Abstract: We will recall a constructive scheme (which was presented in a previous talk of this seminar) which assigns to every tree T on the naturals a Polish space N(T) which is recursively presented in T. The effective structure of N(T) depends on the combinatorial properties of T, so that for various choices of a recursive tree T the spaces N(T) are not effectively-Borel isomorphic to each other. In particular there are recursively presented Polish spaces which are uncountable sets and yet not effectively-Borel isomorphic to the Baire space. On the other hand every recursively presented Polish space is effectively-Borel isomorphic to one of the spaces N(T), so the latter spaces are the correct effective analogue of the Baire space. We are going to present the recent results concerning the structure of the spaces N(T) and give a characterization of N(T) being effectively-Borel isomorphic to the Baire space in terms of the intrinsic properties of T. 

  • October 7, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Takayuki Kihara, Tohoku University
    Non-computability of planar continua

    Abstract: Every nonempty open set in a computable metric space contains a computable point. In contrast, the Non-Basis Theorem asserts that a nonempty co-c.e. closed set in Cantor space (hence, even in the real line) can avoid any computable points. Recent exciting progress in Computable Analysis naturally raises the question whether Non-Basis Theorems exist for connected co-c.e. closed sets. In this talk, we show global and local non-computability results concerning connectivity, local connectivity, simply connectivity, and contractibility for planar continua.

  • October 7, 2011 at 10:30 in S2|15-201
    Hideki Tsuiki, Kyoto University
    Unimodal Maps as Boundary-Restrictions of Two-Dimensional Full-Folding Maps

    Abstract: Unimodal Maps as Boundary-Restrictions of Two-Dimensional Full-Folding Maps" Abstract I will start my talk with ideas on computational aspects for topological spaces. Then I will present what I have got for dynamical system through this idea, with an interactive program showing beautiful 2-dimensional figures. It is a generalization of Gray-code and the tent function to other topological spaces and no background knowledge is required to understand it. 

  • September 16, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Akitoshi Kawamura, University of Tokyo
    Distance k-Sectors and zone diagrams

    Abstract: The bisector of two nonempty sets P and Q in a metric space is the set of all points with equal distance to P and to Q. A distance k-sector of P and Q, where k is an integer, is a (k-1)-tuple (C_1, C_2, ..., C_{k-1}) such that C_i is the bisector of C_{i-1} and C_{i+1} for every i = 1, 2, ..., k-1, where C_0 = P and C_k = Q. This notion, for the case where P and Q are points in Euclidean plane, was introduced by Asano, Matousek, and Tokuyama, motivated by a question of Murata in VLSI design. We prove the existence of a distance k-sector for all k and for every two disjoint, nonempty, closed sets P and Q in Euclidean spaces of any (finite) dimension, or more generally, in proper geodesic spaces (uniqueness remains open). Another generalization of the bisector is the Voronoi diagram, which is the "bisector between n sites". Likewise one can consider the "trisector between n sites", leading to the notion of zone diagrams. Asano, Matousek, and Tokuyama proved the existence and uniqueness of a zone diagram for point sites in Euclidean plane, and Reem and Reich showed existence for two arbitrary sites in an arbitrary metric space. We establish (by a simpler proof than Asano et al.'s) the existence and uniqueness of the zone diagram for n positively separated sites in a Euclidean space of arbitrary (finite) dimension. This talk is based on joint works with K. Imai, J. Matoušek, D. Reem and T. Tokuyama. 
    http://www-imai.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~kawamura/papers/k-sectors/ 
    http://www-imai.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~kawamura/papers/zone/
     
  • August 5, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Akitoshi Kawamura, University of Tokyo
    Why Lipschitz Continuous Ordinary Differential Equations are Polynomial-Space Complete

    Abstract: How complex can the solution of a differential equation be, comparedto the function used to describe the equation? This question can begiven a precise sense consistent with the standard computational complexity theory. In this talk, I will first explain how we define polynomial-time computability of real functions. Then I will discuss the complexity of the solution of initial value problems of differential equations under various assumptions. In particular, an initial value problem given by a polynomial-time computable, Lipschitz continuous function can have a polynomial-space complete solution. This answers Ko's question raised in 1983. Time permitting, I will also mention what this kind of results about the complexity of possible solutions often imply about the hardness of actually finding the solution when the differential equation is given.
  • July 15, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Jaime Gaspar*
    Copies of Classical Logic in Intuitionistic Logic

    Abstract: Classical logic is the usual logic in mathematics, and intuitionistic logic is the constructive part of classical logic. Despite their differences, classical logic can be embedded in intuitionistic logic, that is, there are copies of classical logic in intuitionistic logic. The copies found
    in the literature are all the same. So, is the copy unique? In this talk we answer this question.

    * Financially supported by the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia under grant SFRH/BD/36358/2007.
  • July 8, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Vasco Brattka, Capetown
    Computable Analysis in the Weihrauch Lattice

    Abstract
    : We present recent results on the classification of the computational content of theorems in the Weihrauch lattice. This lattice is a refinementof the Borel hierarchy and allows to classify the computational content oftheorems easily. The essential idea is to view theorems as (possiblymulti-valued) functions that transform certain input data into certainoutput data. The question is then which theorems can be computably andcontinuously transformed into each other. So far, theorems such as theBaire Category Theorem, the Banach Inverse Mapping Theorem, theIntermediate Value Theorem, the Hahn-Banach Theorem, theBolzano-Weierstrass Theorem and several other theorems from analysis havebeen classified from this perspective. The results are not only naturalrefinements of what is known from reverse mathematics, but aclassification of the Weihrauch degree of a theorem leads to a relativelycomplete understanding of the respective theorem regarding its uniform andnon-uniform computability properties. 
  • July 7, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Victor Poupet, Marseille
    An Elementary Construction of an Aperiodic Tile Set

    Abstract
    : Aperiodic tile sets have been widely studied since their introduction in 1962 by Hao Wang. It was initially conjectured by Wang that it was impossible to enforce the aperiodicity of a coloring of the discrete plane Z2 with a finite set of local constraints (there either was a valid periodic coloring or none at all). This would imply that it was decidable whether there existed a valid coloring of the plane for a given set of local rules. This last problem was introduced as the domino problem, and eventually proved undecidable by Robert Berger in 1964. In doing so, Berger produced the first known aperiodic tile set: a set of local constraints that admitted valid colorings of the plane, none of them periodic. Berger's proof was later made significantly simpler by Raphael M. Robinson in 1971 who created the set of Wang tiles now commonly known as the Robinson tile set. 

    Since then many other aperiodic tile sets have been found, not only on the discrete plane, but also on the continuous plane (the most famous being probably Penrose's "kite and darts" set of two tiles). 
    In this talk, I will describe yet another construction of an aperiodic tile set. Although the resulting tile set will produce tilings quite similar to those of Robinson's (an infinite hierarchical structure of embedded  squares) the local constraints will be presented in a (hopefully) more natural way: we will start from simple geometrical figures and organize them step by step by adding new rules progressively to enforce the global structure.

  • May 20, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Martin Lotz, Edinburgh
    Geometry and Complexity in Optimization 
     
    Abstract: The computational complexity of optimization problems depends crucially on the geometry of the problem. In this talk we will discuss geometric measures of condition for optimization problems such as linear programming, and show an application to compressed sensing: the problem of finding sparse solutions to under-determined systems of equations in polynomial time. 
  • May 13, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Chistian Ikenmeyer, Universität Paderborn
    Introduction to Geometric Complextity Theory and Tensor Rank 

    Abstract: Mulmuley and Sohoni in 2001 proposed to view the P vs NP and related problems as specific orbit closure problems and to attack them by methods from geometric invariant and representation theory. We merge these ideas with work of Strassen towards the goal of showing lower bounds for the computational complexity of matrix multiplication. This talk explains some key ideas of this approach on a basic level.
  • Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Jaap van Oosten, Universiteit Utrecht
    Another Heyting Algebra for embedding the Turing degrees

    Abstract: Simpson has been arguing in recent years that classical
    degree theory is "dead" and can be "redeemd" by studying the Medvedev lattice. The Medvedev lattice embeds the Turing and Muchnik degrees and its dual is a Heyting algebra. The Medvedev lattice is intimately related to the notion of realizability studied by Kleene and Vesley. In this talk another Heyting algebra will be presented in which the Turing degrees embed; the "lattice of local operators in the effective topos". The structure will be defined in a very concrete way, and some methods for determining equality/ inequality between its members will be discussed.
  • May 6, 2011 at 13:30 in S2|15-201
    Davorin Lesnik

    Synthetic topology

     Abstract: Synthetic topology is a study of mathematical models, in which objects possess an intrinsic topology in a suitable sense and all maps arecontinuous. Topological definitions and theorems thus becomes statementsabout (internal) logic. The upshot is that this approach gives new insightand topological theorems often become easier to prove, and their validitytransfers to classical topology.


    At the seminar we will discuss the origins, basic ideas and notions of
    synthetic topology, and some proofs. Depending on time, we'll speak about the logical and computational aspects of the theory.

  • April 21, 2011 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
    Jaime Gaspar

    Proof mining Hillam's theorem on fixed point iterations

     

    Abstract: Hillam's theorem gives a characterisation of the convergence of fixed point iterations. We present a quantitative version of Hillam's theorem where we give an explicit rate of metastability (a kind of "finitary rate of convergence") for the fixed point iteration. We explain how this result is obtained by methods of proof theory used in the proof mining program, called functional interpretations, which extract computational content from proofs.

  • February 18, 2011 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
    Arne Seehaus

    Ist Mathematik "(Big) Science" im Sinne von Thomas Kuhn und Derek John de Solla Price?
  • February 11, 2011 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
    Alexander Kartzow
    First-order logic on generalisations of pushdown graphs

  • January 28, 2011 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
    Martin Ziegler
    Relative Computability and Uniform Continuity of Relations

     

    Abstract: In their search for a topological characterization of relatively (i.e. oracle-) computable relations (aka multivalued functions), Brattka and Hertling (1994) have considered two notions: weak continuity (which is weaker than relative computability) and strong continuity (which is stronger than relative computability). Based on the Henkin quantifier, we propose a notion of uniform continuity and explore its relations to weak/strong continuity as well as to relative computability.

  • January 21, 2011 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
    Takako Nemoto, Bern
    Determinacy and reverse mathematics

     

    Abstract: It is known that determinacy of infinite games characterize many subsystems of second order arithmetic.

    In this talk, we treat relatively stronger systems, beyond so-called "big five systems", and consider the possibility of determinacy as a tool to investigate strong systems of second order arithmetic.

  • January 14, 2011 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
    Isolde Adler, Frankfurt
    Nowhere dense graph classes, stability, and the independence property
     
     Abstract: Recently, Nešetřil and Ossona de Mendez introduced nowhere dense classes of finite graphs, a generalisation of many natural and important graph classes such as graphs of bounded degree, planar graphs, graphs excluding a fixed minor and graphs of bounded expansion. These graph classes play an important role in algorithmic graph theory, as many computational problems that are hard in general become tractable when restricted to such classes.


    We observe that the notion of nowhere density is essentially the earlier stability theoretic notion of superflatness, introduced by Podewski and Ziegler in 1978. With this, we show that for a subgraph-closed class C of (not necessarily finite) graphs, the following are equivalent:

    1) C is nowhere dense
    2) C is stable
    3) C is dependent

    The result can be generalised to classes of coloured digraphs. It fails if C is not subgraph-closed. For arbitrary graph classes, dependence is the most general notion, generalising both nowhere density and stability, as well as (locally) bounded clique-width. 

    This is joint work with Hans Adler.

  • November 19, 2010 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
     Dr. Vadim Puzarenko, Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk
    A reducibility on structures 
    Abstract: 
  • November 12, 2010 at 14:00 in S2|15-201
     Carsten Rösnick
     
    Approximate Real Function Maximization and Query Complexity

     Abstract: Let MAX,INT : C[0,1] -> R be the functionals for maximization and integration, respectively. I.e., 

         MAX(f) = sup_{0<x<1} f(x) ,      INT(f) = int_01 f(t) dt .

     

    It has been shown by Friedman and Ko (1982) that for the restricted an be approximated up to an error 2^{-n} on polynomial-space in n. In above's framework of computation, each computable real function f : [0,1] -> R is essentially represented as a type-2 function (in the sense of Weihrauch), mapping a rational sequence to a rational sequence, i.e., f \in (N->Q) -> (N->Q). This enables us to discuss the computational complexity of a real-valued function on classical Turing machines with oracle access. Here, a TM M computing f is presented with an oracle phi \in (N->Q) for x in [0,1] and a precision n in N, such that M produces the output M^\phi(n) \in Q with 

     

         |M^\phi(n) - f(x)| < 2^{-n}.  

     

    When it comes to the computation of the functionals MAX and INT, the encoding of an input for a Turing machine becomes even more critical: Instead of representing an x \in [0,1] by a fast converging sequence \phi \in (N->Q), we now have to encode a continuous real-valued function f : [0,1] -> R. The first goal of this thesis is to devise, compare and explore different ways of accessing an unknown continuous real function via black-box queries that model the actual computation of f as supported by certified numerics like interval arithmetic or the iRRAM. Building on this, the second goal of this Master's Thesis is to determine the query complexity of the MAX-functional with respect to different protocols. In combination with an complexity analysis of the protocols themselves, this should yield more explicit quantitative and parameterized both upper and lower bounds (compared to those presented in the beginning) on the complexity of MAX (and INT).

     

Logic Seminar 2009, 2010

  • August 6, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201  
    René Hartung

    Computation with infinitely presented groups

    Abstract: We give an overview of the current methods for computing with a class of infinitely presented groups, the so-called finitely $L$-presented groups. Theses infinite presentations generalize finite presentations and they allow interesting applications. In particular, our methods allow to compute the lower central series quotients and the Dwyer quotients of the Schur muliplier.

     


     
  • July 13, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Russell Miller, New York City University

    Computable fields and their algebraic closures

     

    Abstract: We present recent results about computable fields F, especially those algebraic over their prime subfields, and embeddings of them into their algebraic closures.  The discussion begins with the basic definitions and a review of Rabin's Theorem, and continues with more exact computability-theoretic comparisons, by Steiner and by the speaker, among the set of irreducible polynomials in F[X], the set of polynomials there with roots in F, and the image of F within computable presentations of its algebraic closure.  Finally, we will discuss the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation on the real numbers, and explain how it changes the array of tools available for examination of these questions.     back to the top of the page

  • June 25, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Jaime Gaspar, TU Darmstadt

    Proof interpretations with truth

    Abstract: A proof interpretation I of a theory S in a theory T is a function mapping
    a formula A of S to a formula AI(x) of T (with distinguished variables x)
    verifying S ` A ) T ` AI(t) for some terms t extracted from a proof of A. Proof
    interpretations are used in:
    • consistency results (e.g., if ?I = ?, then S ` ? ) T ` ?, i.e., S is consistent
    relatively to T);
    • conservation results (e.g., if T ` AI ! A for 02
    formulas A, then S ` A )
    T ` A, i.e., S is conservative over T for 02
    formulas);
    • unprovability results (e.g., if there are no terms t such that T ` AI(t), then
    S 0 A);
    • closure under rules (e.g., if S = T, (9yA(y))I(x) = AI(x) and T ` AI(x) ! A(x),
    then T ` 9yA(y) ) T ` A(t) for some term t, i.e., T has the existence property);
    • extracting computational content from proofs (e.g., extracting t in the previous
    point).
    Closure under rules needs T ` AI(x) ! A that can be achieved by:
    • upgrading T to the characterization theory CT that proves 9xAI(x) $ A;
    • or hardwiring truth in I obtaining It verifying T ` AIt(x) ! A.
    The first option doesn’t work if:
    • CT is classically inconsistent (e.g., bounded proof interpretations);
    • or we want applications to theories weaker than CT.
    So we turn to the second option and present a method to hardwire truth (in proof
    interpretations of Heyting arithmetic satisfying some mild conditions) by defining:
    • a function c that replaces each subformula A of a formula by A^Ac where Ac
    is a “copy” of A;
    • an “inverse” function c−1 that replaces the “copies” Ac by the “originals” A;
    • It = c−1  I  c.
    As examples we hardwire truth in:
    • modified realizability;
    • Diller-Nahm functional interpretation;
    • bounded modified realizability;
    • bounded functional interpretation;
    • slash.

    This is based on a joint work with Paulo Oliva.     back to the top of the page

  •  June 18, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Prof. Hajime Ishihara, Japan Advanced Institute for Science and Technology

    The monotone completeness theorem in constructive reverse

     Abstract: We investigate the monotone completeness theorem: MCT. Every bounded monotone sequence of real numbers converges within a subsystem of elementary analysis EL as a formal framework of constructive reverse mathematics aiming at classifying various theorems in intuitionistic, constructive recursive and classical mathematics. We distinguish a Cauchy sequence with modulus from a Cauchy sequence without modulus. 

    We give a logical principle which is stronger than LPO, and show that it is equivalent to the statement:

     

    (1) Every bounded monotone sequence of real numbers is a Cauchy sequence without modulus.

     

    We also give a function existence axiom which is weaker than the number-number choice for Pi0_1 formulas, and show that it is equivalent to the statement:

     

    (2) Every Cauchy sequence without modulus is a Cauchy sequence with modulus.

     Therefore MCT is divided into the logical statement (1), the function existence statement (2), and the Cauchy completeness of the reals which is constructively provable without countable choice.

    back to the top of the page

  • June 16, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Michal Stronkowski, Karls Universität Prag

    Finite axiomatization of quasivarieties of relational structures

    Abstract: Much attention was paid to the finite axiomatization of varieties and quasivarieties of algebras in the past. But the problem for relational structures was appearing sporadically. I will review what is known about this and add one new theorem. Namely, we prove that the graphs of monoids or groups (as relational structures) almost always generate non finitely axiomatizable quasivarieties.
  • June 15, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Prof. Jimmie Lawson, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

    Clifford Algebras, Möbius Transformations, Vahlen Matrices, and Bruck Loops

     
  • June 4, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Prof. Klaus Meer, Brandenburgische TU Cottbus

    On the expressive CNF formulas of bounded Tree- and Clique-Width

    Abstract: We study the expressive power of certain families of polynomials over a field K. The latter are defined via Boolean formulas in conjunctive normal form. We attach in a natural way a graph to such a formula and study the resulting polynomial families when certain parameters of that graph like tree- and clique-width are assumed to bounded.     back to the top of the page

  • May 21, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Priv.-Doz. Dr. Norbert Müller, Universität Trier

    Exakte reelle Arithmetik - reelle Zahlen aus der Sicht der Informatik

     Abstract: Die Menge der reellen Zahlen ist, anders als etwa die viel leichter algorithmisch greifbaren natürlichen Zahlen, überabzählbar. Als Konsequenz ist bereits die Definition des Begriffs "Berechenbarkeit" für reelle Zahlen deutlich komplexer als die klassische Berechenbarkeitsdefinition für natürliche Zahlen mit Turingmaschinen. 

    Implementierungen dieses Berechenbarkeitsbegriffes werden oft als "exakte reelle Arithmetik" bezeichnet; Basis ist dabei in der Regel eine Intervallarithmetik mit mehrfach genauen Zahlen, ergänzt um eine automatisierte Genauigkeitssteuerung. Damit sind numerische Algorithmen möglich, die in der endlichen Welt der double-precision-Zahlen nicht sinnvoll wären. 

     Im Vortrag stellen wir einige der Prinzipien einer solchen Implementierung vor und werden dabei insbesondere als Beispiele ihre Anwendung (und ihr Verhalten) bei der "logistic map" und einfachen Differentialgleichungen betrachten.     back to the top of the page
  • February 12, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Jaime Gaspar, TU Darmstad
     

    Slash and completeness 

     

    Abstract: Gödel's incompleteness theorems gave a fatal blow in Hilbert's program. Despite this, there were some attempts to salvage the program. One of them, by Hilbert himself, was to add omega-rule (if A(n) is provable for each fixed n, then "for all n, A(n)" is provable) to Peano arithmetic. This rule evades Gödel's incompleteness and gives a complete arithmetical theory.   Proof interpretations are proof-theoretic tools to prove consistency results, conservation results, closure under rules and to extract computational content from proofs. The slash is a very simple toy case of a proof interpretation. However, the omega-rule boosts the slash, resulting in some interesting applications. We will talk about one of them: a very simple proof of the completeness of Peano arithmetic plus omega-rule.     back to the top of the page

     
  •  POSTPONED! 

     Martin Otto, TU Darmstadt
    Acyclicity in hypergraph covers and applications 

     

    Abstract: Which degrees of acyclicity can be achieved in FINITE hypergraph covers? While actual acyclicity can always be had in generally infinite unfoldings, finite covers can only guarantee certain bounded forms of acyclicity at best.   I want to discuss new constructions of weakly N-acyclic covers (joint work with Vince Barany and Georg Gottlob, Oxford) and N-acyclic covers with a view to their use in the finite model theory of guarded logics.     back to the top of the page

     
  •  January 29, 2010 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Martin Ziegler, TU Darmstadt

    Expressiveness and Computational Complexity of Euclidean Quantum Logic 

     

    Abstract: Quantum logic generalizes, and in dimension one coincides with, Boolean logic. The satisfiability problem of quantum logic formulas is shown NP-complete in dimension two. We then extend these considerations to three and higher-dimensional Euclidean spaces R^d and C^d. For fixed d>2, quantum satisfiability turns out polytime-equivalent to the real feasibility of a multivariate quartic polynomial equation: a well-known problem lying (probably strictly) between NP and PSPACE. We finally investigate the problem over INdefinite finite dimensions and relate it to the real feasibility of quartic NONcommutative *-polynomial equations.     back to the top of the page

     
  •  November 27, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201
    Peter Scheiblechner, Purdue 
     

     Comparison of Complexity over the Real vs. Complex Numbers 

     

    Abstract: We compare the complexity of certain problems over the reals with their corresponding versions over the complex numbers. We argue in particular that the problem of deciding whether a system of (real) polynomial equations has a real solution is strictly harder than asking for a complex solution, since it cannot be solved by a complex BSS-machine.   On the other side we describe a family of problems, whose real versions are in the model of algebraic decision trees strictly easier than its complex versions.   For this end we prove a new lower bound for the decision complexity of a closed algebraic set X in C^n in terms of the sum of its (compactly supported) Betti numbers b_c(W), which is for the first time better than logarithmic in b_c(W). 

    back to the top of the page

     
  •  November 13, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201
      Matthias Schroeder, Munich  

     Topology in computable analysis 

     

    Abstract: Computable Analysis studies computability over the real numbers and related spaces. Since computable functions are continuous in some sense, topology plays an important role in this theory. The cartesian closed category QCB of quotients of countably based topological spaces turns out to be an appropriate category for modelling the topological aspects of higher type computation.

     

    In this talk, we discuss topological properties of the Kleene-Kreisel continuous functionals and their surprising relationship to an open problem in exact real-number computation. This problem is whether two approaches in functional programming on higher type computability over the reals coincide.

     

    We show that the sequential topology on the space N^(N^N), which is the space of Kleene-Kreisel continuous functionals of type 2, is neither zero-dimensional nor regular. Moreover, we establish non-regularity of further function spaces formed in the cartesian closed category of sequential spaces. This is one of the categories from which QCB inherits its cartesian closed structure.     back to the top of the page

     
  •  November 6, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201 
     Stephane Le Roux, LIX, Ecole Polytechnique  

     Sequential game theory: a formal and abstract approach 

     

    Abstract: In a game from game theory, a Nash equilibrium (NE) is a combination of one strategy per agent such that no agent can increase his payoff by unilaterally changing his strategy. Kuhn proved that all (tree-like) sequential games have NE. Osborne and Rubinstein abstracted over these games and Kuhn's result: they proved a *sufficient* condition on agent *preferences* for all games to have NE. I will present a *necessary and sufficient* condition, thus accounting for the game-theoretic frameworks that were left aside. The proof is *formalised* using Coq, and contrary to usual game theory it adopts an inductive approach to trees for definitions and proofs. By rephrasing a few game-theoretic concepts, by ignoring useless ones, and by characterising the proof-theoretic strength of Kuhn's/Osborne and Rubinstein's development, the talk also intends to clarifies sequential game theory.

     

    Then I will sketch an alternative proof. Both proofs so far pre-process the preferences by topological sorting, which is surprising since it decreases the number of NE. Finally I will sketch two other proofs that pre-process the preferences only by transitive closure. The four proofs are all constructive and by induction, and I will compare them when seen as algorithms. The four proofs also constitute diverse viewpoints on the same concepts, the trial of diverse techniques against the same problem, and reusable techniques for similar structures. 

    back to the top of the page

     
  •  October 9, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201  
    Jaime Gaspar, TU Darmstadt 
     

     Proof interpretations with truth 

     

    Abstract: Proof interpretations are proof-theoretic tools to extract computational content (such as computable choice functions) from proofs. In some cases this only works (at least without strengthening the theories involved) for proofs of theorems of a particular logical form, but we wish to extract computational content from proofs of arbitrary theorems. Interpretations with truth have been developed to cope with this. We present two new methods on how to do hardwire truth and apply them to new proof interpretations.

     

    In a first part we make a brief introduction to proof interpretations and the extraction of computational content from proofs. Then in a second part we present our two methods. Finally in a third part we apply them in some case studies.

     

    This is joint work with Paulo Oliva.     back to the top of the page

     
  •  September 18, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201 
     Martin Ziegler,TU  Darmstadt  

     Real Computation with Least Discrete Advice: A Complexity Theory of Nonuniform Computability 

     

    Abstract: It is folklore particularly in numerical and computer sciences that, instead of solving some general problem f:A->B, additional structural information about the input x in A (that is any kind of promise that x belongs to a certain subset A' of A) should be taken advantage of. Some examples from real number computation show that such discrete advice can even make the difference between computability and uncomputability. We turn this into a both topological and combinatorial complexity theory of information, investigating for several practical problems how much advice is necessary and sufficient to render them computable. Specifically, finding a nontrivial solution to a homogeneous linear equation A*x=0 for a given singular real NxN-matrix A is possible when knowing rank(A)=0,1,...,N-1; and we show this to be best possible. Similarly, diagonalizing (i.e. finding a BASIS of eigenvectors of) a given real symmetric NxN-matrix is possible when knowing the number of distinct eigenvalues: an integer between 1 and N (the latter corresponding to the nondegenerate case). And again we show that N-fold (i.e. roughly log N bits of) additional information is indeed necessary in order to render this problem (continuous and) computable; whereas for finding SOME SINGLE eigenvector of A, providing the truncated binary logarithm of the least-dimensional eigenspace of A--i.e. Theta(log N)-fold advice--is sufficient and optimal.     back to the top of the page

     
  • September 4, 2009 at 14.00 in S215/201 
    Vassilis Gregoriades, Athens  

    Effective Descriptive Set Theory and Applications in Analysis 

     

    Abstract: Descriptive Set theory is the area of mathematics which studies the structure of definable sets in separable and complete metric spaces. A central part of this area is Effective Descriptive Set Theory (for shortness Effective Theory) which uses ideas from Logic and in particular from Recursion Theory. This area provides a deeper understanding of the subject and has applications in Analysis. We begin this lecture with a brief summary of the basic concepts and we give a new approach to Effective Theory which yields some surprising results. Then we present some connections with General Topology; all theorems we talk about involve notions from both areas. Finally we give some results in Banach space Theory. Here all theorems involve only classic (i.e., non-effective) notions but still Effective Theory is essential for their proof.     back to the top of the page

     
  • August 14, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201 
    Richard Garner, Cambridge 
     

    Ionads: a generalised notion of topological space

     
  • July 17, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201 
    Martin Otto, TU Darmstadt 
     

    Acyclicity in hypergraph covers

     
  • July 10, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201 
    Pavol Safarik
    , TU Darmstadt 

    On the Computational Content of Bolzano-Weierstraß

     

    Abstract: We will apply the methods developed in the field of 'proof mining' to the Bolzano-Weierstraß theorem BW and calibrate the computational contribution of using this theorem in a proof of a combinatorial statement. Using a simple proof based on weak König's lemma and arithmetical comprehension we provide an explicit solution of the Gödel functional interpretation as well as the monotone functional interpretation of BW for the product space \prod_i \in N [-k_i, k_i] for a given sequence of rational numbers (k_i) \subseteq Q (with the standard product metric). In fact, we will use it to get optimal program and bound extraction theorems for proofs based on fixed instances of BW, i.e. for BW applied to fixed sequences in \prod_i \in N [-k_i, k_i].     back to the top of the page

     
  • July 3, 2009 at 14:00 in S215/201 
    Anuj Dawar, Cambridge 
     

    Logics with Rank Operators

     

    Abstract: It is a long-standing open problem in descriptive complexity theory whether there is a logic that expresses exactly the polynomial-time decidable properties of unordered structures. It has been known since the early 90s that fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) is not sufficient and there have been several proposals for more expressive logics. Taking our inspiration from recent results that show that natural linear-algebraic operations are not definable in FPC, we propose FPR - an extension of fixed-point logic with an operator for matrix rank. We show that this is strictly more expressive than FPC and can express the polynomial-time problems that have been shown to be inexpressible in FPC. We also show that FO+R, the extension of first-order logic with rank operators is surprisingly expressive. It can express some forms of transitive closure and, on ordered structures, captures the complexity classes ModpL.

     

    In this talk, I will give the history and general background to the question and explain the context of the new results. I will also point to several interesting open problems. (Joint work with Martin Grohe, Bjarki Holm and Bastian Laubner). 

     back to the top of the page 

Kontakt

Technische Universität Darmstadt
Fachbereich Mathematik
Arbeitsgruppe Logik

S2|15
Schloßgartenstraße 7
64289 Darmstadt

Tel.: +49-(0)6151-164686
 Fax: +49-(0)6151-163317

logik@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de

Sekretariat Raum S2|15-206
Barbara Bergsträßer
Betina Schubotz

Öffnungszeiten:
Mo. - Fr.


10:00-15:00

Im Gebäude S2|15 im
Lageplan
der TUD,
Abschnitt Stadtmitte Nord,
oder unter Anreise.

A A A | Print Drucken | Impressum Impressum | Contact Kontakt
zum Seitenanfangzum Seitenanfang